Fair Access Research: Admissions

Admissions is one of five themes in the Fair Access Research Project (FAR), 蜜桃AV鈥檚 innovative approach to widening participation and breaking down barriers to make higher education more inclusive.

Within this theme we need to explore questions such as:

Are university admissions processes fair to all?听
Are they transparent?听
Can widening participation (WP) students access what they need to help in their decisions about HE?

Within this page, we detail three projects within FAR which have investigated the impact of the admissions process for听WP students, with the aims of increasing understanding of the relationship between admissions and widening access.

Students with the real potential to succeed in Higher Education need to have an equal opportunity to come to university, whatever their background or life experience.

Keeping HE Admissions fair

Project summary

In 2016, 听co-principal investigator of the FAR Project,听was invited to join a National Expert Think Tank (NETT)听to inform and influence topical national debate on fairness and good practice in HE admissions.听The group then developed a framework for selecting (or not selecting) to use additional admission assessment as part of a fair admissions process.

The NETT was convened by convened by Supporting Professionalism in Admissions (SPA) to consider how fair admissions can be maintained and enhanced in the current HE landscape, how fair admissions is understood across the sector in the UK, and what this means to individual HE providers.

Dr Heaslip led the working group which explored additional admission assessments used and conducted research to explore schools, colleges and university admission staff perceptions and use of additional admissions assessments.

to find out more about this work.

Keeping HE Admissions fair: Publications and resources

Understanding admissions

Project summary

In consideration of fair admissions and the notion of transparency,听we analysed our admissions data exploring application and conversion rates across a number of WP characteristics and undertook a review highlighting existing areas of good practice and any areas which required future work.

Principles of fair admissions advocated by听听are those identified in the听听which identified that a fair admissions system should:

Be transparent
Enable institutions to select students who are able to complete the course, as judged by their achievements and their potential
Strive to use assessment methods that are reliable and valid
Seek to minimise barriers for applicants
Be professional in every aspect and underpinned by appropriate institutional structures and processes.

This notion of transparency in the admissions process is gaining momentum; the recent white paper听听(Department for Business and Skills 2016)听 advocates the introduction of a 鈥榯ransparency鈥� duty requiring regulated higher education providers to publish data on the backgrounds of their applicants thus shining a light on the admissions process.听

One way of ensuring this transparency review is for institutions to critically analyse their admissions data exploring application and conversion rates across a number of WP characteristics.

Understanding admissions: outcomes

We reviewed the admissions data held by 蜜桃AV (from initial application through to final enrolment) from 2010/11 to 2014/15 and compared these to the national data with regards to specific Widening Participation groups including:

Low Participation Neighbourhoods (LPN),
Students with a disability
颁补谤别听濒别补惫别谤蝉
Specific听demographic data听categories (ACORN)

What this enabled us to do is to undertake a systematic review across the different programmes and faculties across 蜜桃AV highlighting existing areas of good practice and any areas which required future work.

It was apparent from the review that 蜜桃AV had a sustained record of attracting applications from Widening Participation (WP) students, a number of which were converted to enrolments.听However听it also identified that more targeted work was required in the area of Low Participant Neighbourhoods, where fewer young people transition to higher education,听in order to strengthen the number of applications and conversions.

In addition, while we recognised applications from care leavers to 蜜桃AV was higher than the national average and we felt this was worthy of future work. This review also highlighted that reaching conclusions regarding the admissions and enrolment of disabled students was problematic due to the extent of non-disclosure to questions about disability at application stage: this enabled us to focus on this as another area of work.

Care Leavers Project

This project, arising from the FAR programme,听is a听collaborative听one with many local stakeholders including three Virtual School Heads,听exploring the perceptions and aspirations of young people in care considering progressing to further or higher education.

While the 0.7% proportion of total 蜜桃AV students who are care leavers is above the national figure of 0.6% we felt that more could be done within this area. There are national concerns that care leavers remain very disadvantaged with regards to accessing HE (). In 2015, less than a quarter of 19 to 21-year-old care leavers were in further or higher education.

This associated study aimed to explore perceptions and aspirations of young people in care considering progressing to further or higher education. In particular, we were keen to identify where they currently seek advice and guidance, the resources they access and some of the challenges they face in making an informed decision.

This project was a collaborative project between 蜜桃AV and the three virtual school Head teachers in Bournemouth, Poole and Dorset. The study included focus groups and interviews with the key stakeholders (young people in care, care leavers in HE, social workers, virtual school teams, school teachers, foster carers and other key workers).
This provided a rich picture of young people鈥檚 ambitions, the breadth of advice and guidance available and the importance of personal relationships in supporting these young people.

Care Leavers Project: What our findings suggest

The findings suggest that young people seek advice from a range of sources. However, sometimes the guidance given is felt to be limited or incomplete. One of the overwhelming findings was the sense of the barriers that young people from a care background face when considering HE and these included social, financial or cultural capital required to continue into further or higher education.

For those young people who do make this transition, it is clear that on-going individual support provided by the institution will help overcome the on-going personal, financial and academic challenges they may face.

This study has identified the support and commitment available to young people in care and also highlighted their increasing reliance on online resources. As well as using such technology for social purposes (e.g. Facebook, Twitter) they also use online sites to seek further information, clarify uncertainties and help in their decision-making.

It is clear that the relationship they have with one or more of their key contacts is crucial in helping them develop the confidence and knowledge to progress to further or higher education.

Care Leavers Project: Publications and resources

How do I perceive myself?听Understanding perceptions of disability

This study explored HE students鈥� perceptions of what disability implies in the context of applying to a UK university and aimed to understand some of the complexities and experiences of disability.听听

A review was completed of听the admissions and enrolment data for all applicants to 蜜桃AV between academic years 2010-11 to 2014-15, to听explore if there were differences in application and enrolment for students from different backgrounds.

The data was analysed according to key widening participation markers including:

Whether or not the applicant disclosed a disability
Whether or not the applicant came from a low-participation neighbourhood (LPN)
Whether or not the applicant was a care leaver.

Understanding perceptions of disability: approach

One of the key findings from this review was that 蜜桃AV (in common with other universities) had a significant number of applications (1,257) from applicants听who did not听specify on their UCAS application form if they had a disability or not. This raised the question as to why some students enter higher education with a disability (as defined on the UCAS form), but do not always declare it at the application stage.

In particular, we were keen to understand the extent to which some applicants are unsure whether or not they have a disability for the purposes of the question regarding disability on application forms and how the students themselves define 鈥檇isability鈥�.

For the purposes of this study, and aligned with UCAS听Admissions Guidance, 鈥榙isability鈥� applies to any student with:

A social/communication impairment (e.g. Asperger, ADHD/ADD, and individuals on the Autistic Spectrum)
A visual impairment; a serious hearing impairment
A long-standing medical condition (e.g. cancer, diabetes, epilepsy, ME)
An on-going mental health condition (e.g. anxiety, Bipolar)
A specific learning difficulty (e.g. dyslexia, dyspraxia and dyscalculia)
A physical impairment or mobility issue (UCAS, 2017)

Two Undergraduate Research Assistants worked with the FAR team to explore听perceptions of disability听in the admissions process. A comprehensive literature review was completed听to complement听the analysis of how students view disability and the factors that might influence whether they declared a specific disability or not.

Understanding perceptions of disability: outcomes

The findings suggested there is a lack of understanding about what is or is not a disability, concern that disclosure will negatively impact on the application decision and anxiety that such disclosure would in some way mark out or disadvantage the student.听

The themes that emerge are focused on previous experiences and assumptions about disability, confusion and uncertainty about declaring a disability at the point of application, the risk and stigma perceived or experienced on declaring a disability and concern about the future consequences of being labelled as disabled.

This small-scale study suggests that there is still work to be done in supporting young people in understanding the range and breadth of disabilities and addressing some of the actual or perceived risks they appear to associate with declaring a disability.

While some of this may be achieved whilst they are still at school, universities have a role to play in explaining and reinforcing that declaring a disability does not impact on their overall application and, indeed, allows them to be more aware of and able to support all those students starting at university with any physical, mental or medical disability.

However, it seems that it is the term disability itself which carries connotations of negativity 鈥� it is about conditions 鈥榯hey鈥� have, rather than 鈥業鈥� have. This may inform decisions at university application stage about the best terminology to use that encourages students to make more informed choices about disclosure any condition or situation that would ensure they get the very best support at the point of application and beyond.

We were interested to see how students view disability, and what factors influence whether an individual would declare a specific disability on the UCAS application form, or why they would choose not to declare a disability.

蜜桃AV